To all IAJS Members: Thank you to Matt Koeske, for compiling this list of articles and references. I new discussion is launching in January 2011 hosted by George B. Hogenson:
Main JAP Articles By George B. Hogenson:
- “Archetypes as action patterns <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 54, Issue 3, June 2009, Pages: 325–337, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x
- “Synchronicity and moments of meeting <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01769.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 54, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages: 183–197, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01769.x
- “The Self, the symbolic and synchronicity: virtual realities and the emergence of the psyche <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00531.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 50, Issue 3, June 2005, Pages: 271–284, DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8774.2005.00531.x
- “What are symbols symbols of? Situated action, mythological bootstrapping and the emergence of the Self <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.0441.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 49, Issue 1, February 2004, Pages: 67–81, DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8774.2004.0441.x
- “The Baldwin effect: a neglected influence on C. G. Jung’s evolutionary thinking <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.00269/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 46, Issue 4, October 2001, Pages: 591–611, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.00269
See Also Responses:
- “Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’ <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 55, Issue 4, September 2010, Pages: 543–549, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x
- “Reply to Raya Jones <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.00429a/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 5, November 2003, Pages: 714–718, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.00429a
- “Reply to Maloney <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00102/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 2, April 2003, Pages: 265–266, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00102
- “Responses <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 1, February 2003, Pages: 101–116, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res
- “Response to Pietikainen and Stevens <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.00034/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 43, Issue 3, July 1998, Pages: 357–372, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.00034
- I also recommend these JAP articles and exchanges on the topic of emergence vs. innateness in archetypes (some repeats with the above; I might have missed one or two, but I think among these lists all of the JAP exchanges on this topic are represented):
- Pietikainen, P. (1998), Archetypes as symbolic forms. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 325–343. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00032
- Stevens, A. (1998), Response to P. Pietikainen. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 345–355. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00033
- Hogenson, G. B. (1998), Response to Pietikainen and Stevens. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 357–372. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00034
- McFarland Solomon, H. (1998), Response to Petteri Pietikainen’s ‘Archetypes as symbolic forms’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 373–377. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00035
- Pietikainen, P. (1998), Response to Hester McFarland Solomon, George B. Hogenson and Anthony Stevens. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 379–388. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00036
- Knox, J. (1999), The relevance of attachment theory to a contemporary Jungian view of the internal world: internal working models, implicit memory and internal objects. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 511–530. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00117
- Maloney, A. (1999), Preference ratings of images representing archetypal themes: an empirical study of the concept of archetypes. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 101–116. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00070
- Mogenson, G. (1999), Psyche’s archetypes: A response to Pietikainen, Stevens, Hogenson and Solomon. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 125–133. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00073
- Saunders, P. and Skar, P. (2001), Archetypes, complexes and self-organization. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 305–323. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00238
- Hogenson, G. B. (2001), The Baldwin effect: a neglected influence on C. G. Jung’s evolutionary thinking. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 591–611. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00269
- Knox, J. M. (2001), Memories, fantasies, archetypes: an exploration of some connections between cognitive science and analytical psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 613–635. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00270
- McDowell, M. J. (2001), Principle of organization: a dynamic-systems view of the archetype-as-such. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 637–654. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00271
- Maloney, A. and Hogenson, G. (2003), Responses. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48: 101–116. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res
- Jones, R. A. (2003), On innatism: a response to Hogenson. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48: 705–714. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00429
- Merchant, J. (2006), The developmental/emergent model of archetype, its implications and its application to shamanism. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 51: 125–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.2006.576_1.x
- Knox, J. (2009), Mirror neurons and embodied simulation in the development of archetypes and self-agency. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 307–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01782.x
- Hogenson, G. B. (2009), Archetypes as action patterns. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 325–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x
- Merchant, J. (2009), A reappraisal of classical archetype theory and its implications for theory and practice. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 339–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01784.x
- Goodwyn, E. (2010), Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 502–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01862.x
- Knox, J. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 522–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_1.x
- Merchant, J. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 534–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_2.x
- Hogenson, G. B. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 543–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x
- Goodwyn, E. (2010), The author replies. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 550–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01864.
The IAJS is for everyone with an interest in Jungian studies. Membership is open to those from any discipline, artistic or cultural practice, including analysts and psychotherapists, with an interest in Jungian and post-Jungian studies at a scholarly level. 
The International Journal of Jungian Studies provides a forum and focus for the exciting and important work being done in Jungian and Post-Jungian studies across the world.