[ Become a member of the IAJS Association - enjoy INTELLECTUAL STIMULATION and membership privileges...]

Rebirth and Renewal - IAJS Conference 2014
Main JAP Articles By George B. Hogenson:

To all IAJS Members: Thank you to Matt Koeske, for compiling this list of articles and references. I new discussion is launching in January 2011 hosted by George B. Hogenson:

Main JAP Articles By George B. Hogenson:

See Also Responses:

  • “Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’ <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 55, Issue 4, September 2010, Pages: 543–549, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x
  • “Reply to Raya Jones <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.00429a/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 5, November 2003, Pages: 714–718, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.00429a
  • “Reply to Maloney <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00102/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 2, April 2003, Pages: 265–266, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00102
  • “Responses <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 1, February 2003, Pages: 101–116, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res
  • “Response to Pietikainen and Stevens <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1465-5922.00034/abstract> “, Journal of Analytical Psychology, Volume 43, Issue 3, July 1998, Pages: 357–372, DOI: 10.1111/1465-5922.00034
  • I also recommend these JAP articles and exchanges on the topic of emergence vs. innateness in archetypes (some repeats with the above; I might have missed one or two, but I think among these lists all of the JAP exchanges on this topic are represented):
  • Pietikainen, P. (1998), Archetypes as symbolic forms. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 325–343. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00032
  • Stevens, A. (1998), Response to P. Pietikainen. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 345–355. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00033
  • Hogenson, G. B. (1998), Response to Pietikainen and Stevens. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 357–372. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00034
  • McFarland Solomon, H. (1998), Response to Petteri Pietikainen’s ‘Archetypes as symbolic forms’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 373–377. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00035
  • Pietikainen, P. (1998), Response to Hester McFarland Solomon, George B. Hogenson and Anthony Stevens. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 43: 379–388. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00036
  • Knox, J. (1999), The relevance of attachment theory to a contemporary Jungian view of the internal world: internal working models, implicit memory and internal objects. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 511–530. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00117
  • Maloney, A. (1999), Preference ratings of images representing archetypal themes: an empirical study of the concept of archetypes. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 101–116. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00070
  • Mogenson, G. (1999), Psyche’s archetypes: A response to Pietikainen, Stevens, Hogenson and Solomon. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 44: 125–133. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00073
  • Saunders, P. and Skar, P. (2001), Archetypes, complexes and self-organization. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 305–323. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00238
  • Hogenson, G. B. (2001), The Baldwin effect: a neglected influence on C. G. Jung’s evolutionary thinking. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 591–611. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00269
  • Knox, J. M. (2001), Memories, fantasies, archetypes: an exploration of some connections between cognitive science and analytical psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 613–635. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00270
  • McDowell, M. J. (2001), Principle of organization: a dynamic-systems view of the archetype-as-such. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 46: 637–654. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00271
  • Maloney, A. and Hogenson, G. (2003), Responses. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48: 101–116. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.t01-1-00Res
  • Jones, R. A. (2003), On innatism: a response to Hogenson. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 48: 705–714. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00429
  • Merchant, J. (2006), The developmental/emergent model of archetype, its implications and its application to shamanism. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 51: 125–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.2006.576_1.x
  • Knox, J. (2009), Mirror neurons and embodied simulation in the development of archetypes and self-agency. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 307–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01782.x
  • Hogenson, G. B. (2009), Archetypes as action patterns. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 325–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x
  • Merchant, J. (2009), A reappraisal of classical archetype theory and its implications for theory and practice. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54: 339–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01784.x
  • Goodwyn, E. (2010), Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 502–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01862.x
  • Knox, J. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 522–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_1.x
  • Merchant, J. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 534–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_2.x
  • Hogenson, G. B. (2010), Responses to Erik Goodwyn’s ‘Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 543–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01863_3.x
  • Goodwyn, E. (2010), The author replies. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55: 550–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01864.

Speak Your Mind

*

↑ Top of Page